An Advent Prayer (2022)

I didn’t grow up with an appreciation for the season of Advent. For me the day after Thanksgiving was the first day of the Christmas season. I certainly had heard the word ‘Advent,’ but in my young mind ‘Advent’ and ‘Christmas’ were synonyms. It was only in my adult life that I was introduced to the Christian Calendar and began to appreciate the blessing of observing a season set apart to prepare our hearts and minds for the coming of Jesus.

As I’ve been meditating on the season of Advent this year, I have found myself reflecting on an uncomfortable historical reality. As many prophecies as there were about the coming of the Messianic King, and as many times as God declared that He would personally undertake the delivery of His people from their slavery to sin, no one was expecting God to take on human flesh in the Person of Jesus. God surprised the world when the second Person of the divine Trinity was conceived in the womb of Mary.

In hindsight, we might have known what God was planning. After all, God had declared through the prophet Jeremiah:

“Then I Myself will gather the remnant of My flock out of all the countries where I have driven them, and bring them back to their pasture, and they will be fruitful and multiply.”

Jeremiah 23:3, NASB

Perhaps we might have known that God would not leave the salvation of humanity to a human being. Perhaps we might have suspected that God Himself would be the bridge between heaven and earth, between God and humanity. Perhaps we might even have wondered if God would enter human history personally, taking on the full form of humanity while remaining fully God. But none did suspect this. When God walked amongst us in the Person of Jesus, none recognized Him as God until, after having been crucified, on the third day He rose from the dead.

I wonder if, as it was in the days of Jesus, it is still in our day. I wonder if we are as mistaken about Jesus’ second coming as those in the first century were about His first. We, too, must attend to the Scriptures—to the testimonies of the prophets and apostles—if we are to be prepared for His coming. And during this season of Advent, I am allowing a prophecy of Jesus’ second coming to ignite my imagination and inspire my preparation. The prophecy is from Revelation 22:12-17, and it reads as follows:

12 “Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to reward each one as his work deserves. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.”

14 Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they will have the right to the tree of life, and may enter the city by the gates. 15 Outside are the dogs, the sorcerers, the sexually immoral persons, the murderers, the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying.

16 “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you of these things for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.”

17 The Spirit and the bride say, “Come.” And let the one who hears say, “Come.” And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires, take the water of life without cost.

Revelation 22:12-17, NASB

May the Lord open our eyes and our ears during this season of Advent as we continue to await the coming of our rightful King. Come, Lord Jesus!

~ J. Thomas ~

John Wesley Sermons – The More Excellent Way (1 Corinthians 12:31)



The original sermon can be found in: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 7 (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1996), 26-37.
Language edited and updated by J. Thomas Johnson – Sunday, June 26, 2022

[Why revisit the sermons of John Wesley? What could a preacher from 1700s England have to say that is worth hearing today? I’m not sure. But, I am certain that when I was praying and seeking the Lord about our next sermon series that this was where I was pointed. Methodism today is certainly facing a significant moment of decision. In a purely practical sense, perhaps it is useful for us to return to the beginning of this movement as we consider what it means to be Methodists today.

However, I have found an additional blessing in reconsidering Wesley’s sermons. I am finding myself challenged to read and understand the Scriptures in ways I had not considered before. For instance, I have often read Jesus as a wisdom teacher who placed ideals before us to which we should strive. Wesley, on the other hand, as will be clear in the sermon today, read Jesus not as an idealist but as One who reveals the will of God to us. Consequently, Wesley read every teaching of Jesus as a revelation of the will of God—almost as a new law by which we should govern our lives. I think this is a perspective sorely lacking in our day, and I have found it refreshing to listen to someone who read and responded to Jesus in this way.

In the message today, Wesley sought to be deeply practical. Jesus has taught that to be His disciple one must, “deny himself, take up his cross daily, and follow Jesus” (Luke 9:23, NASB). Wesley understood this to be a call to a universal lifestyle of self-denial. And so, he sought to explore what a life of self-denial would look like every day. Some of his examples are dated, but all of them were Wesley’s attempt to embrace Jesus’ call to self-denial in even the smallest areas of his life. Rather than trying to update these applications, I’ve left them as they were.

One more comment before we begin to listen again to Wesley’s reading of the Scripture. On some occasions, Wesley gets a little too ascetic, in my opinion. In other words, sometimes Wesley’s understanding of self-denial carries with it too much of the Greek philosophical assumption that earthly pleasures were evil in and of themselves. We should recognize that when God created the heavens and the earth, God called the creation good. There is nothing inherently evil in the flesh or in the capacity that we have for pleasure or enjoyment. Also, the Scriptures do not teach that our mental capacities are morally superior to our bodily capacities. I will say that, for his time, Wesley was remarkably balanced in the way he spoke of these things. But, I would caution that self-denial is not simply a way of speaking of restraining bodily desires or of denying oneself pleasure so as to increase one’s contemplative devotion to God. The Christian life is a balance of body and spirit, both submitted to God and enjoying all of creation within the boundaries God has set.

In any case, without further ado, let’s revisit Wesley’s sermon, “The More Excellent Way.”]

31 But earnestly desire the greater gifts. And yet, I am going to show you a far better way.

1 Corinthians 12:31, NASB

In the preceding verses, the Apostle Paul has been speaking about the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit, such as healing of the sick, prophesying, speaking in languages which the speaker had never learned, and the miraculous interpretation of languages. And Paul has said that these gifts of the Holy Spirit are desirable. In fact, Paul encouraged the Corinthians (at least the teachers among them) to desire them earnestly that they themselves might be useful to the body of believers and to the non-Christian world.

“And yet,” Paul has said, “I am going to show you a far better way”—a far more desirable way than all of these put together. This far better way will not fail to lead you to happiness, both in this world and in the world to come. Even if a person had all of these extraordinary gifts, they might find themselves to be miserable, both on earth and in eternity.

It does not appear that the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit were common in the Church for more than two or three centuries. We seldom hear of them after that fatal period when the Roman Emperor Constantine called himself a Christian and, from an empty desire to promote the cause of Christianity, heaped riches and power and honor upon Christians in general and upon the Christian clergy in particular. From that time forward, they ceased almost entirely. And this was not because (as some have ignorantly assumed) “because there was no more need for them,” since all the world had become Christian. This is a miserable mistake. Not even five percent of the world was even marginally Christian in the years that followed.

The real cause of the cessation of the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit was that “most people’s love,” the love of almost all Christians, “became cold” (Matthew 24:12, NASB). Christians, then, had no more of the Spirit of Christ than non-Christians. When the Son of Man came to examine His Church, He could hardly find faith on the earth (Luke 18:8). This was the real cause of the cessation of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit in the Christian Church, because Christians had become non-Christians again, and had only a dead form of Christianity left.

However, I do not want to speak today of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit. Today I will speak of the ordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit, and these, too, we should earnestly desire, in order to be more useful in our generation. We may desire the gift of convincing speech in order to probe the unbelieving heart along with the gift of persuasion, both to move the emotions and to enlighten the mind. We may desire knowledge, both of the word of God and of God’s activities in the world. We may desire enough faith to allow us to do miraculous works. We may desire a clear articulation, or a pleasant sermon which is preached in submission to the will of God. We may desire any of these things or other gifts that would allow us to be useful wherever we are. But there is a far better way.

This far better way is the way of love; the way of loving all human beings for God’s sake; the way of humble, gentle, patient love. This is the far better way that Paul has described so clearly in the rest of the chapter. And without this love, Paul has assured us that all eloquence, all knowledge, all faith, all works, and all sufferings are of no more value in the sight of God than that of a series loud, annoying bangs and contribute nothing at all to our salvation. Without love, all we know, all we believe, all we do, and all we suffer will not benefit us at all on the day we stand before Jesus and make an account for how we have lived in this world.

But today I would like to look at this text from a slightly different angle and point out a far better way in another sense. One ancient writer has observed that from the very beginning there have always been two orders of Christians. One order of Christian lives a law-abiding life, is obedient in all things, does not rebel against the customs or expectations of the world, does many good works, abstains from obvious evils, and attends to the basic requirements of God. These Christians try to live in such a way that their consciences remain clean, but they do not work to improve themselves. In most things, there is no difference between them and their neighbors.

The other order of Christians does not only avoid all kinds of evil, but they are eager for good deeds of every kind. They attend to all the basic requirements of God, but they also desire earnestly to have the attitude in themselves which was also in Christ Jesus, and they try sincerely to live in every way as Jesus lived. In order to do this, they live lives of universal self-denial. They deny themselves daily of any pleasure which they do not believe will prepare them for finding their delight in God. They take up their crosses daily. As Jesus has taught them, they “strive,” they agonize without ceasing, “to enter through the narrow door” (Luke 13:24, NASB). And above all, they are willing to endure any agony or pain that is necessary to arrive at the summit of Christian holiness, “leaving the elementary teaching about the Christ, [to] press on to maturity;” (Hebrews 6:1, NASB); “to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge, that [they] may be filled to all the fullness of God” (Ephesians 3:19, NASB).

From my experience and my observations over a long period of time, I am inclined to believe that whoever finds redemption in the blood of Jesus, whoever is justified, has the choice of walking in the higher or the lower path that I have just described. I believe that at that moment, the Holy Spirit calls this person to the far better way and encourages them to walk in it—to choose the narrowest path in the narrow way, to long for the heights and depths of holiness, to long to embody the full image of God. But, if this person does not accept the Spirit’s offer, they decline into the lower order of Christians, perhaps, at first, without realizing it. This person still walks in what might be considered a good way, serving God in some degree, and they will find mercy at the end of their earthly lives through the blood of the covenant.

I would not want to extinguish a dimly burning wick (Matthew 12:20, NASB). In other words, I would not want to discourage those who are serving God in a lower degree. But, at the same time, I do not want them to remain as they are. I would encourage those on the lower road, to come up higher. Without thundering hell and damnation in their ears, without condemning the lives they are currently living, without telling them that the way they are walking leads to destruction, I will try to point out to them what is, in every respect, a far better way.

And please remember that I am not claiming that all who do not walk on this higher road are on the road to hell. Even so, I am saying that those who walk on the lower road will not have as high a place in the new heavens and the new earth as they would have had had they chosen the better part. And will it be a minor loss to have fewer stars in your crown of glory? Will it be a small thing to have a lower place than you might have had in the kingdom of your Father? Of course, there will be no sorrow in the new heavens and the new earth. There all tears will be wiped from our eyes. But, if it were possible for grief to enter into that place, we would grieve at that irreparable loss. Irreparable then, but not now. Now, by the grace of God, we may still choose the far better way. Let’s compare, in a few particulars, the far better way and the way in which most Christians walk.

Let’s begin at the beginning of the day—in the morning. Most Christians who no longer work for their living or who make their living with a more flexible schedule wake up, particularly in the winter, at eight or nine in the morning, after having slept for eight or nine or more hours. I don’t believe any longer (though I did believe this fifty years ago) that all who indulge themselves in this way are walking on the road to destruction.  But, neither do I believe they are on the way to the new heavens and the new earth, denying themselves, and taking up their crosses daily. I am certain there is a far better way to promote both mental and bodily health.

Being now in my sixties, I have learned that healthy men require, on average, between six and seven hours of sleep, and healthy women often require a little more—from seven to eight hours—each day. In my experience, this amount of sleep is most advantageous to both the body and the spirit. This sleep schedule is preferable to any medication which I have taken, both for preventing and for resolving nervous disorders. It is, therefore, a far better way, in defiance of what is popular and customary, to take only as much sleep as experience proves our bodies require. This is indisputably most conducive to bodily and spiritual health.

So why do so many people not adopt this schedule? Is it because it is difficult? No. With human strength maybe it is challenging for some, but all things are possible with God. And, by God’s grace, all things will be possible for you, too. If you bring this matter to God in prayer continually, you will find it not only possible, but easy. Even more, it will be far easier to rise early consistently than only to do it once in a while. But, of course, the routine must be started on the right end. If you want to wake up early, then you must go to sleep early. Impose it on yourself, except in extraordinary circumstances, to go to bed at a fixed time. Then the challenge of it will soon be over, but the advantage of it will remain forever.

Many Christians pray in the morning when they awaken, and most of those probably use some form of prayer that they learned when they were eight or ten years old. Now, I am not condemning those who pray in this way as mocking God (as many do), even though they have used the same prayer, without variation, for twenty or thirty years. But surely, there is a far better way of ordering our private devotions. What if we were to follow the advice given by William Law in his book A Call to Christians Showing the Necessity of a Devout and Holy Life? He encourages us to consider our outward and inward states and then to pray accordingly.

For instance, suppose your outward state is prosperous—suppose you are healthy, at ease, having plenty, in good relationship with your family, having good neighbors and good friends. If this is true, then your outward state calls for praise and thanksgiving to God. On the other hand, if you are in difficult circumstances—if God has given you much to be anxious about, if you are in poverty, if you are in need of basic necessities, if you are distressed, if you are at risk of harm, if you are suffering pain or sickness—, then you are clearly called to pour our your heart before God in response to these circumstances.

Similarly, you might pray in ways according to your inward state—your mental, emotional, or psychological state. Do you feel weighed down either from a sense of sin or because of recurrent temptations? Then, let your prayer include whatever confessions, requests, or pleas that might help you in your distress. However, what if you are experiencing peace, what if you are rejoicing in God, what if you are recognizing the ways in which He is comforting you? Then say with the Psalmist, “28You are my God, and I give thanks to You; You are my God, I exalt You” (Psalm 118:28, NASB). You may also, when you have time, add to your prayers a little reading and meditation, and even a psalm of praise—the natural outflow of a thankful heart. You must certainly see that this is a far better way than you have used before.

Most Christians, after praying, usually then get busy with the work they have been entrusted to do by their employer. Every person that has any desire to be a Christian will not fail to do this, since it is impossible for an idle person to be a good person. Laziness is inconsistent with Christianity. But, how do you understand your worldly work? Do you work primarily to provide things for yourself and for your family? That’s a good reason, but it does not go far enough. All people work for those reasons, religious and non-religious alike. But a Christian may go much further. Our goal in all the work we do is to please God, not to do our own will, but to do the will of the One Who has sent us into the world, to do the will of God on earth as the angels do in the heavens. We work for eternity. We “do not work for the food that perishes” (this is the smallest part of our motives), “but for the food that lasts for eternal life” (John 6:27, NASB). Isn’t this a far better way?

And how do you do your work? I hope you work diligently. I hope that “whatever your hand finds to do, [you] do it with all your might” (Ecclesiastes 9:10, NASB). I hope that you are fair in your work, giving to each person what they are due, in every area of your life. And I hope that you are a merciful person, doing to every person what you would want them to do to you. All of this is good, but a Christian is called to go further, to add faithfulness to God to their fairness, and to add heartfelt prayer to the work of their hands. Without these things, all a person’s diligence and fairness only reveal him or her to be an honorable non-Christian, and there are many who claim to be Christians who go no farther than honorable non-Christians.

And, in which spirit do you work? Do you work in the spirit of the world or in the Spirit of Christ? My fear is that thousands of those who are considered to be good Christians do not even understand what I am asking. If we work in the Spirit of Christ, we walk as Jesus walked in all we do, from the beginning to the end. We do everything in the spirit of sacrifice, giving up our will to the will of God, and continually aiming, not at ease, pleasure, or riches—not at anything this temporary world can provide—, but only at the glory of God. Can anyone really deny that this is a far better way of doing our work in the world?

 And these material bodies in which we live in this world require constant care or they will return to the dust from which they were taken even sooner than nature requires. To prevent this, we have to eat every day. Among Heathens in the ancient past it was common to set aside some of what they ate for their gods, even though, as the Apostle Paul has reminded us, their gods were only demons (1 Corinthians 10:14-22). A recent historian has written:

“It seems there was once a similar custom to this in our own country. For we often see a gentleman, before he sits down to dinner in his own house, holding his hat in front of his face, and oftentimes seeming to say something, though usually in a way that no one can tell what he has said.”

Now, what if, instead of superstitious rituals, every parent earnestly requested a blessing from God and gave Him thanks before he or she sat down to eat any meal—breakfast, lunch, or supper? Wouldn’t this be a far better way than to go through a meaningless ritual, which, in the end, is nothing more than a mockery both of God and of humans?

And as to the amount of food we eat, honorable people do not usually eat to excess, at least not so much as to make them sick with food or intoxicated with drink. And most honorable people eat their food politely and with a measure of cheerfulness, which is said to help digestion. So far, so good. And, as long as they only take as much plain, cheap, wholesome food as their body requires for health of mind and body, no one should criticize this. For instance, I would not require anybody to take the advice of the poet George Herbert, who wrote:

Take thy meat; think it dust:

Then eat a bit, And say with all,

Earth to earth I commit.

This is too dreary. It does not fit with the cheerfulness that should be part of a Christian meal. Allow me to illustrate what I mean with a story.

One day the King of France was out hunting with a company of people, and he outrode them. After looking for him for some time, they found him sitting in a cottage eating bread and cheese. When he saw them, he cried out, “Where have I been living? I’ve never tasted food this good in all my life!” “Sire, said one of them, “you never had so good a sauce before, because you have never been hungry.”

Now it is true that hunger makes things taste better, but there is a better sauce than hunger—thankfulness. All food tastes better with thankfulness. And why shouldn’t all your meals be seasoned with it? When we eat, we don’t need to think about death. We should receive every morsel as a pledge of eternal life. By the food that you eat, your Creator not only delays your dying, but He promises that, very soon, “death shall be swallowed up in victory.”

Mealtimes also often include conversation. After all, it is natural to refresh our minds as we refresh our bodies. How should Christians converse together? What topics should they discuss? If our conversations are harmless—if they don’t include anything profane, or immodest, or untrue, or unkind—if there is no gossiping, backbiting, or speaking evil about people, then we have reason to thank God for keeping us from these evils. But there is more than this that is involved in conducting ourselves “in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ” (Philippians 1:27, NASB).

First, our conversations must be good—that is, the things we talk about should be good things. As the Apostle Paul has taught us: “Let no unwholesome word come out of your mouth” (Ephesians 4:29a, NASB). In other words, we should not discuss just anything that occurs to us or anything that might be occurring in the world around us. What have we to do with politics and government? It is not our business to fight the wars or to reform the state, unless a remarkable event requires us to comment on the justice or mercy of God. Of course, sometimes we have to speak of worldly things. Otherwise, we might as well leave the world. But we should only do this when absolutely necessary, and then we should quickly return to better subjects.

Secondly, Paul continued in Ephesians by saying, “but if there is any good word for edification according to the need of the moment, say that, so that it will give grace to those who hear” (Ephesians 4:29b, NASB). Therefore, our conversation should be deliberately designed to strengthen or build up both us and our hearers either in faith or in love or in holiness.  Thirdly, we must ensure that our conversation is not only interesting or entertaining, but that it in some way gives grace to those who hear. Now isn’t this a far better way of conversing than simply by aiming to be harmless?

So far, we have discussed far better ways both of governing our conversations and of doing our work in the world. But we cannot always be working. Both our bodies and our minds require some relaxation. We need intervals of rest from work. I will have to speak very bluntly about this because it a subject which many have misunderstood.

 Leisure activities are quite varied. There are sporting activities like hunting, shooting, and fishing. Some activities are more social, such as races, costume parties, movies or plays, dances, and concerts. Others are more private, such as playing cards or reading. Some activities which used to be popular are not any longer. For instance, noble men and women rarely engage in hawking any more, and the rest of us rarely watch people fight each other with swords, staffs, or sticks. We no longer use dogs to attack bears or bulls for sport. And, if it were not because of a few wealthy investors, cock-fighting would not be practiced in England at all anymore. I don’t want to say anymore about these foul remains of barbarity than that they are an offense not only to the Christian religion, but to the very nature of what it means to be human.

Of course, I would not condemn sporting activities in the same way. If one has nothing better to do, then feel free to run foxes and rabbits out of breath. I don’t want to comment on horse races, either, unless someone wants to try to debate the issue. When it comes to movies or plays, I don’t personally allow myself to watch dramatic plays or movies. I can’t watch them with a clear conscience, at least not in an English theatre, given all the profanity and lustful and sinful behaviors that are routinely featured there, but possibly others can.

I can’t say very much about balls or formal parties, which, even though they are generally more upstanding than costume parties, tend to have the same general spirit. So, certainly have all public venues which include dancing. And, of course, given the way dancing is done today, this is not surprising. In the ancient past men and women never danced together, but always in separate rooms. This was the way dancing was done in ancient Greece and for a long time in Rome. In both those societies men and women would only have danced together in the course of engaging in prostitution. When it comes to playing cards, I feel the same as I do about seeing plays or movies. I cannot do it myself with a clear conscience, but I don’t pass judgment on anyone who feels differently. I leave that decision between them and God, since they need to answer to Him, not to me, for their decisions.

But, even if all of the activities that I’ve just discussed were all innocent diversions, for those of us who love and fear God aren’t there far better ways of spending our free time? If people of strong character want to spend their free time outdoors, then they could consider working in their yards or planting and maintaining gardens, or they could visit and talk with the wiser of their neighbors, or they could visit the sick, the poor, the widows, and the fatherless. If they wanted to spend their free time inside, they could read meaningful books on history or religious writings or books on nature. They could learn to play a musical instrument or stretch themselves by doing activities to challenge and strengthen their minds. But, more than all of this, when we have learned how to pray and converse with God, we will find that as the air fills the sky so prayer will be part of all that we do. Then we will be able to say that we are aware of God’s presence in every moment of every day.

I want to consider one more subject—that is, the use of money. How do most Christians use money? And is there a far better way?

Many Christians usually set apart some of their yearly income for charitable uses. I have known a few people who said, like Zaccheus, “Behold, Lord, half of my possessions I am giving to the poor” (Luke 19:8, NASB). O how I pray to God that He would multiply these sorts of people on the earth! But, even though few make this kind of commitment, there are thousands who give large amounts of money to the poor each year, especially in response to a tragedy or crisis. I praise God for all who respond in this way. May they never grow weary of doing good! May God restore what they have given, seven-fold! But still, I want to show you a far better way.

Each of us should consider ourselves as a person into whose hands God has entrusted a part of His wealth which is to be used according to His direction. And God’s direction is that each of us should consider ourselves as only one of a number of impoverished people who are to be cared for out of the portion of His wealth that He has entrusted to us. You have two advantages over the others who are to be cared for out of the wealth entrusted to you: First, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35, NASB). Second, you are to care for yourself first and others second. This is how Christians are to see both themselves and others.

But, to be even more candid: if you have no family, then after you have provided for yourself, give away all that remains, so that

Each Christmas your accounts may clear,

And wind your bottom round the year.

This was the practice of all the young people at Oxford who were called Methodists. For example: one of them earned thirty pounds a year [which is equivalent to about $6,500 today]. He lived on 28 and gave away 2. Three years later he made ninety pounds [equivalent to near $20,000 today]. He still lived on 28, and gave away 62. The next year he made 120 pounds [equivalent to $26,000 today]. He still lived on 28, and gave away 92 to the poor. Isn’t this a far better way?

Secondly, if you have a family, seriously consider in prayer with God how much each member of the family truly needs in order to have what is necessary for life and for godliness. And in general, do not allow them to have less than this, but also, do not allow them to have much more than you allow yourself. Thirdly, having done this, commit yourself to not raising your standard of living. I charge you in the name of God, do not increase your standard of living! As more income comes daily or yearly than you need, let it go. Otherwise, you are laying up for yourself treasure on earth. And this our Lord Jesus forbid us to do just as He forbid murder and adultery. By storing up treasure on earth, therefore, we are “storing up wrath for [ourselves] on the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God” (Romans 2:5, NASB).

But suppose that storing up treasure on earth were not forbidden by Jesus. How could we find it wise to spend money in a way which God may possibly forgive instead of spending it in a way which God will most certainly reward? We will not receive any reward in heaven for what we save up. We will only receive a reward in heaven for what we give away. Every dollar we put into an earthly savings account is lost. It bears no interest in heaven. But every dollar we give to the poor is put into the bank of heaven. And it will bring glorious interest which will accumulate throughout all of eternity.

13 Who among you is wise and understanding?” (James 3:13, NASB). Let the wise person decide today, at this hour and moment, by God’s help, to choose in all ways the far better way. And let him or her faithfully walk in it in sleep, prayer, work, food, conversation, and leisure, and particularly with regard to the use of money. This one thing I will do, I will store up treasure in heaven; I will give to God the things that are God’s; I will give Him all my goods, and all my heart! [Amen.]

John Wesley Sermons – On Obedience to Parents (Colossians 3:20)



The original sermon can be found in: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 7 (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1996), 98-108.
Language edited and updated by J. Thomas Johnson – Sunday, June 19, 2022

[Given that today is Father’s Day on the secular calendar, I wanted to choose a sermon to revisit in which Wesley discussed parenting or children. I narrowed my search down to three sermons: “On Family Religion,” “On the Education of Children,” and “On Obedience to Parents.”

There are perhaps few practices that have changed more in western cultures between the 1700s and today than those involved in the raising and educating of children. For this reason, it is extremely difficult to revisit Wesley’s sermons on family and parenting today. Much of the language he used and the assumptions he held are not only different than those employed today, but the assumptions of 16th century England about parenting were often in contradiction to the assumptions of today. Therefore, of the three sermons I was considering, I chose the one I felt was the least cultural and most Biblical.

Even so, I have had to update Wesley’s language, and perhaps in updating it, I could be accused of having changed it. For instance, Wesley often spoke about breaking a child’s will. Hearing that language today, it sounds as though Wesley was encouraging parents to exercise a type of abusive control of their children. However, given that Wesley believed and taught frequently on Biblical love as the inheritance of all Christians and that love was patient, kind, self-controlled, not given to fits of rage, and so on, it seems impossible that Wesley meant that parents should be abusive, short-tempered, or out of control with their children. So, I have translated Wesley’s commendation to break a child’s will into the language of curbing a child’s self-centered willfulness or rebelliousness. I’m convinced this is essentially what Wesley meant, but perhaps I have altered his meaning a bit with that translation.

Also, in the midst of this sermon, Wesley spent considerable time condemning the wearing of elegant clothing, encouraging parents both to model and to instruct their children in the virtue of dressing plainly. Again, this is a subject that is out of step with most contemporary assumptions about Christian behavior. However, I think there is something deeply wise and deeply biblical about what Wesley was commending. Therefore, when we get to that part of the sermon, I will provide some explanatory comments that I hope will help to bring Wesley’s concerns to today’s issues. Well, without further ado, let’s consider Wesley’s sermon “On Obedience to Parents.”]

 20 Children, obey your parents in everything, for this is pleasing to the Lord.

Colossians 3:20, NASB

Are there any innate principles shared by all people? [Is there such a thing as natural law? Is there a sort of a universal conscience that is present in all people, in all places, at all times?] This subject has been disputed over many centuries, perhaps millennia. Even so, one principle that seems to have been embraced in a great diversity of cultures throughout history is the idea that children should honor their parents. . . .

And wherever God has revealed His will to humans, this teaching has been a part of that revelation. In fact, it is in the revelation of God that the principle of honoring one’s parents has been re-affirmed, enlarged considerably, and enforced strongly. In the Covenant of Sinai, those who did not honor their parents were to be put to death. And this was one of the laws that our blessed Lord Jesus did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Therefore, Jesus, [in Mark 7:9-13,] severely reprimanded the Scribes and the Pharisees for nullifying the command to honor one’s parents through their traditions. Jesus’ teachings should, therefore, reveal to us that the obligation to honor one’s parents applies not only to Ancient Israel, but also to Christians.

This is substantially what the Apostle Paul was communicating to the Ephesians when he wrote:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right.

Ephesians 6:1, NASB

And, again, in writing to the Colossians:

20 Children, obey your parents in everything, for this is pleasing to the Lord.

Colossians 3:20, NASB

We can see that Paul supports this responsibility with three reasons. First, in his letter to the Ephesians he added, “for this is right.” In other words, obeying one’s parents is a matter of righteousness, not simply of mercy. Obedience is what parents are due—it is what we owe them for the life we have received from them. Secondly, “This is pleasing to the Lord.” It is especially pleasing to the great Father of humans and of angels that we should pay honor and obedience to our earthly parents. Thirdly, it “is the first commandment with a promise” (Ephesians 6:2, NASB). This is the first commandment of God in which God attached a promise—namely, “so that it may turn out well for you, and that you may live long on the earth” (Ephesians 6:3, NASB). This promise has been generally understood to include health, earthly blessings, and long life. And we have seen many evidences that it belongs not only to the Covenant of Sinai, but also to the promises of God to Christians. Many remarkable instances of God’s faithfulness to this promise can be seen today.

But what did Paul mean to commend when he said, “Children, obey your parents in everything?” I will endeavor, with the assistance of God, first to explain Paul’s meaning, and then to apply it.

First, I will endeavor to explain the Scripture’s meaning, particularly because so few people seem to understand this teaching. Look around the world—and not the non-Christian world, but the Christian world specifically—, among Bible-believing Christians who have access to the Bible in their own language, and how many appear to have ever heard of this teaching? Here and there a child obeys his or her parent out of fear or perhaps out of love or affection. But how many children can you find that obey their fathers and mothers out of a sense of duty to God? And how many parents can you find today who consistently place this responsibility upon their children? I wonder if a vast majority both of parents and of children are totally ignorant of this whole subject. For the sake of those who may be unaware of God’s requirements in this respect, I will discuss it as plainly as I can. But still, I am quite aware that those who are unwilling to be convinced will not understand me at all. It will be as though I were speaking in Hebrew or Greek.

It is quite clear that by parents the Apostle Paul meant both fathers and mothers, as he referred his readers to the fifth commandment, which names both the one and the other. However human laws throughout history may vary, the law of God does not distinguish between mothers and fathers. The obligation given to children is to obey them both.

But before we consider how we are to obey our parents, perhaps we might first ask how long we are to obey them. Are children to honor and obey their parents only until they can walk, or until they go to school, or until they can read and write, or until they are as tall as their parents, or until they graduate from high school or college? No. If children were to obey their parents only because they were afraid of punishment, or because they depended on them for food and shelter, what honor would there be in such obedience? Only those who honor and obey their parents when they can live without them, and when they neither hope nor fear anything from them, shall receive praise from God.

But is an adult man or woman or a married man or woman under any further obligation to honor and obey his or her parents? With respect to marriage, it is true that “a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24, NASB); and by the same reasoning, a woman is to leave her father and mother and be joined to her husband. Consequently, there may be some instances in which the responsibilities of marriage must take precedence over one’s responsibility to parents. However, I do not see either in the Scripture or by the scrutiny of reason that marriage either cancels or diminishes the general obligation of children to their parents. Much less does our responsibility to our parents diminish because we have reached twenty-one years of age.

I certainly never behaved as if this was the case myself. When I was in my thirties, I considered my relationship with my father to be the same as when I was ten. And when I was in my forties, I considered myself just as responsible to obey my mother in everything lawful, as I did when I was learning to walk.

But, what is implied in Paul’s instruction: “Children, obey your parents in everything” (Colossians 3:20)? Certainly, the first point of obedience is to do nothing which your father or mother forbids, whether it be a major thing or a minor thing. Nothing should be more obvious than that the prohibition of a parent should bind every conscientious child—unless, of course, that prohibition were to cause us to disobey God.

But, there is more. Obedience can be understood a bit further. A gentle parent may totally disapprove of something that s/he does not expressly forbid. What is the responsibility of a child in these instances? How seriously should this disapproval be taken? Whether a parent has prohibited a behavior or not, a person who wishes to have a clean conscience should be safe and avoid offending a parent unnecessarily. The most honorable decision is certainly to avoid behaviors of which you know your parents disapprove. To do otherwise would imply a degree of disobedience which those of tender conscience would wish to avoid.

The second thing implied in this teaching of Paul is that we should do everything which our father or mother asks, whether it is large or small, provided that what is asked is not contrary to any of the teachings of God. In this way, God has given an honor to parents which even governmental authorities do not have. The Queen of England, for instance, is a sovereign ruler, yet she does not have the power to ask me to do anything unless the law of the land requires it of me. For the queen has no power but to execute the law. The will of the queen is not law to a citizen of England. But the will of a parent is a law to the child, who is bound in conscience to submit, unless submission would result in rebellion against God.

It is with admirable wisdom that God has given us this teaching. When children are weak, the strength of their parents can support them, and when children are ignorant, the wisdom of their parents can guide them until children have strength and understanding of their own. In the same way, the will of parents may guide the wills of their children until they have wisdom and experience to guide themselves. This is, therefore, the very first thing which children must learn—that they are to obey their parents, to submit to their will, in all things. And this must be put into effect long before children can understand the reason for it, and, indeed, long before they are capable of understanding any of the teachings of Christianity.

This is why the Apostle Paul directs all parents to bring up their children “in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4, NASB). For their self-centered willfulness can be curbed by proper discipline, even in their early infancy, long before they are ready for instruction. This, therefore, is the first responsibility of all parents: From the time a child is able to begin to reason in any degree, parents must curb their self-centered willfulness by accustoming them to submitting to your will, which will prepare them for submitting to the will of their Father Who is in heaven.

But how few children do we find, even at six or eight years old, who understand anything of this? Indeed, how could they understand it, seeing that they have no one to teach them? Are not their parents, both father and mother, as ignorant of this submissiveness as they themselves? Whom can we find, even among Christians, who have the vaguest idea about it? Haven’t we all witnessed this ignorance ourselves? Haven’t we been present when a father or mother has said to his or her child, “Do so and so,” and the child, without any second thought replied, “No,” and then the parent quietly passed it by without comment? Do we not see that by this cruel indulgence, we are training up our children, by brazen rebellion against their parents, to rebel, eventually, against God? Therefore, we are raising up our children for the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels! If any parent really understood this, they would neither eat nor drink nor sleep until they had taught their children better lessons, instilling in them the fear of ever giving that diabolical answer again.

For those parents who fear God, allow me to explore this a little further. If we do fear God, how can we allow a child above a year old to say, “I will do,” what we have forbidden, or “I won’t do” what we have asked and to go unpunished? We must confront this self-centered will in our children right away, so that they may be deterred from making a habit of rebelliousness. Have we no compassion for our children, no regard for their salvation or destruction? For those of us who do not allow our children to curse or swear in our presence, we must realize that disobedience is as certain a way to destruction as cursing or swearing. Confront him, confront her, in the Name of God. In the words of Samuel Butler, do not “spare the rod and spoil the child.” Do not surrender your child to his or her own self-centered willfulness, for that will be to surrender them to the devil himself. The Scriptures say:

Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.

1 Peter 5:8, NASB

As painful as it may be for us, we must pluck our children out of the lion’s teeth. Teach your children submissiveness that they may not perish. Curb their self-centered willfulness that you may save their souls.

I don’t know how to emphasize this sufficiently or to impress it on you more strongly. Permit me to add part of a letter on this subject which was printed some years ago.

In order to shape the minds of children, the first thing to be done is to curb their self-centered willfulness. To educate them takes time and must progress slowly, but curbing the self-centeredness of their wills is something that must be done from the beginning—the sooner the better. For if we delay to teach this, they quickly develop a stubbornness, which is extremely difficult to curb later, and often cannot be curbed later without methods we would be loathe to employ. Therefore, I call those parents cruel who are often considered kind and indulgent, who permit their children to develop habits which they know must eventually be broken.

I insist on curbing the self-centered willfulness of children early, because this is the only foundation for a religious education. When this has been accomplished, then a child becomes capable of being governed by the wisdom of his or her parents until his or her own understanding matures.

And there is still more to consider. Self-centered willfulness is the root of all sin and misery in the world, so whatever encourages this in children ensures their future misery and faithlessness. Consequently, whatever discourages and restrains it, promotes their future happiness and faithfulness. This should be obvious to those of us who realize that religion is nothing else but doing the will of God, and not our own. So, since self-centered willfulness represents an enormous impediment to both our earthly and eternal happiness, no indulgence of it can be trivial and no curbing of it can be unprofitable. Heaven or hell depends on this alone. So, the parent who works to curb this in his or her children, works together with God in the saving of a soul. But, the parent who indulges self-centered willfulness does the devil’s work, makes Christian faith more difficult, places salvation out of reach, and does all that is in them to condemn their child forever!

Therefore, I must earnestly repeat what I have already said: curb their self-centered willfulness early, begin this work before they can walk, before they can speak clearly, or perhaps even before they can speak at all. However hard it may be, resist their stubbornness and curb their self-centered willfulness if you would not condemn your child. I beg you, parents, not to neglect this responsibility, nor to delay it! Therefore, let a child from a year old be taught to respect our discipline and not to throw tantrums. In order to accomplish this, we should commit to never allowing our child to have anything he or she cries for—absolutely nothing, large or small, or else we will sabotage our own efforts. From that early age we must, at all costs, ensure that our children do as they are told, no matter how challenging or strenuous we find the endeavor. Don’t let anyone convince you that these efforts are cruel, for it is cruel not to discipline our children’s rebelliousness. If we teach them to curb their self-centered willfulness early, then the call of Jesus to self-denial will be understandable to them later, and perhaps in the future our children may come to bless our sacrificial efforts for all eternity.

On the contrary, how dreadful are the consequences of that accursed kindness which gives children freedom to follow their own desires and does not teach them the virtue of submissiveness from their infancy? It is primarily due to this that so many Christian parents raise children who end up as atheists or agnostics—even more, children who, as adults, often have no respect for them as parents at all. Why is this? Because their self-centeredness and rebelliousness was not curbed from the beginning; because they were not required from early infancy to obey their parents in all things and to submit to them as unto the Lord; because they were not taught from the time they began to reason that the will of their parents was, for them, the will of God and that to disobey their parents was rebellion against God, and an open door for all manner of ungodliness.

Having explained the teachings of the Apostle Paul in these verses, I will now proceed to apply them. And permit me, first, to apply this text to you who are parents and are concerned with the proper instruction of your children. Do you understand these things yourselves? Are you thoroughly convinced of these important truths? Have you taken them to heart yourselves? Are you putting them into practice with regard to your own children? Have you disciplined your children before they were capable of instruction? Have you confronted their self-centered willfulness from infancy, and do you continue to do so in opposition both to their nature and to this culture’s customs? Did you explain to them, as soon as they began to comprehend instruction, your reasons for raising them in this way? Have you taught them that the will of God is the sole law of every intelligent creature, and have you shown them that it is the will of God that they obey you in all things? Do you repeat this over and over again until they perfectly understand it? Never be weary of this labor of love, for your labor will not always be in vain.

At the very least, we must not teach our children to disobey by rewarding them for disobedience. Remember that you do this every time you give them anything because they cry for it. For children are quite intelligent in that if you reward them for crying they will certainly cry again. There will be no end to it unless we make it a sacred rule to give them nothing for which they cry. And the easiest way to accomplish this is never to tolerate their crying aloud out of desire or want. Train them up to obedience in this area, and you will find it easier to bring them to obey in others.

Why not begin today? Certainly, we can see that this is the better way, both for them and for us. Why then do we disobey the Scriptures? Because we are cowards; because we lack perseverance; and because this certainly requires a great deal of patience, far more than we have by nature. But the grace of God is sufficient for us. We can do all things through Christ who strengthens us (Philippians 4:13). This grace is sufficient to give us both diligence and resolve. Otherwise, laziness will be as great a hindrance as cowardice. For without suffering, we cannot overcome. Nothing can be accomplished with carelessness or sloppiness. Labor on, never tire, teach lesson after lesson until patience has completed its work.

But there is another obstacle that is as difficult to overcome as either laziness or cowardice. It is called fondness or affection, and it is usually mistaken for love. But, O how different from it! Fondness or affection is, in actuality, hate, and hate of the most mischievous kind, leading to the destruction of both body and soul. Do not give way to it any longer, no, not for a moment! Fight against it with all your might, for the love of God, for the love or your children, and for the love of your soul!

I have one more word to say to parents. If, in spite of all the Apostle has said, you encourage your children by your example to adorn themselves with “gold or pearls or expensive apparel,” (1 Timothy 2:9, NASB), you and they must drop into the pit together. And even if they do it despite your having set a good example, the fault is still yours as well as theirs.  For, even if you have not put any ornament on your child that you would not wear yourself, they would not have done it themselves if you had required them to obey you from their infancy and taught them the responsibility of submissiveness from at least two years old. Whenever, therefore, I see the gaudy-dressed child of plain-dressed parents, I see at once that the parents are defective either in knowledge or in faithfulness. Either the parents are ignorant of their own or their child’s responsibility, or the parents have not practiced what they know.

[Wesley’s concern here strikes me as a Biblical one. The concern of 1 Timothy 2 is that of a façade that is intended to distract an onlooker from the true heart and character of a person, drawing their attention instead to superficial beauty or affectations. In Wesley’s day (and in Paul’s day), this was mostly accomplished through dress—clothing, hairstyles, and external adornment. For the Apostle Paul, plainness of dress was not a virtue in and of itself, but it was a means to an end. The point for Paul was that Christians should be clothing themselves with good works, calling attention to their character and not to superficial masks which project beauty where no true godly beauty exists.

Today, we, too, often dress in such a way as to project something about ourselves that has little to do with our character. But, even more, we also often hide our true character behind branding, profile pictures, social media handles, and so on. Many are very careful to conceal their character, and instead spend a great deal of time crafting a public persona that presents the face to the world that they want the world to see—often an idealized version of who they wish they were or think they should be. Paul’s point, and Wesley’s was that we should be laboring to be people who do not distract attention from our character with masks, but whose true character is available for all to see and is consistent with that of Jesus. So, Wesley attacked gaudy-dress, but what he was really attacking was the superficial construction of a false-persona that may look godly, but in fact concealed a corrupted heart. In fact, for Wesley, the very desire to adorn oneself with external extravagance was itself an indication that the heart was not being formed by faithfulness to Jesus.]

Wesley continued…

I cannot dismiss this subject yet. I am pained continually at seeing Christian parents allowing their children to run into the same folly of dress as those who are not Christians at all. In God’s Name, why do we allow them to vary a hair’s breath from the Scripture’s teaching? “Because they’ll do it anyway.” Of course, they will. Whose fault is that? Why did we not curb their self-centered willfulness from infancy? At the very least, we must do it now. It’s better late than never. It should have been done before they were two years old. It may still be done at eight or ten, but with far more difficulty. However, do it now and accept the difficulty of it as the just reward for past neglect.

Now, at least, follow through whatever it costs. Do not be wishy-washy like foolish Eli, who said to his wayward sons, “No, my sons; for the report is not good which I hear the Lord’s people circulating,” (1 Samuel 2:24, NASB), instead of restraining them with a firm hand. Rather, speak as calmly as possible, but firmly and preemptively, “I will have it this way,” and then follow through with what you say. Instill in them consistently the love of plain dress and the hatred of finery. Show them the reason that you choose to dress plainly and explain to them why the same should be true of them. Defy laziness, cowardice, and foolish affection, and always follow through with what you say. If you love your children’s souls, make and keep them as plain as yourselves.

And I charge you, grandparents, before God, do not hinder your children’s efforts in these respects. Do not dare to give your grandchildren what their parents deny them. Never take the side of your grandchildren against their parents, and never criticize parents in front of their children. If you will not strengthen their authority, as you ought to do, at the very least you must not undermine it. If you have any true devotion to the Christian faith, help your children in the work of loving their children in these ways.

Permit me now to apply the Apostle Paul’s teachings to you, children, particularly to you who are children of Christian parents. In fact, if you do not fear God, I am not speaking to you right now.  But if you really do fear God and if you have a desire to please Him, then you will have a desire to understand all His commandments, the fifth in particular. Do you understand it now? Do you now understand what your responsibility to your father and mother is? Are you now considering that by God’s will your parents’ will should be a law to you? Have you ever considered the true extent of the obedience to your parents that God requires of us? The Scriptures say, “Children, obey your parents in everything, for this is pleasing to the Lord” (Colossians 3:20, NASB). There is no exception to this command unless what your parents require is illegal or against God. Have you done this? Have you even meant to do this?

We must be honest with ourselves. Is your conscience clear in this matter? Do you do nothing which you know to be contrary to the will either of your father or your mother? Do you never do anything which he or she forbids? Do you avoid doing everything which they dislike, as far as you can in good conscience? On the other hand, are you careful to do whatever your parent asks? Do you pay attention to them in order to learn how to please them, to make their lives as easy and pleasant as you can? Whoever here practices this responsibility in their daily lives in order to please God in all things, blessed are you of the Lord. As the Scripture says, “it may turn out well for you, and you may live long on the earth” (Ephesians 6:3, NASB).

But as for those who remain unconcerned about this teaching of the Scriptures, who do not consider it a responsibility before God to obey our parents in all things, but choose when and if to obey based on our own sensibilities, who frequently do those things they have forbidden or of which they disapprove and fail to do what they ask, suppose that you awake in the night, begin to feel the weight of your sin, and begin to cry out to God for mercy? Is it any wonder that you find no answer from God while you are guilty of this unrepented sin? How can any of us expect mercy from God until we obey Him by obeying our parents?

But suppose I have, by an uncommon act of mercy, experienced the forgiving love of God. Can I expect, even though I hunger and thirst after righteousness, after the perfect love of God, that I should ever attain these things while I am living in outward sin—that is, in the willful transgression of a known law of God—in disobedience to my parents? Is it not rather amazing that God has not yet withdrawn His Holy Spirit from me, that He still continues to strive with me, though I am continually grieving His Spirit?

Don’t grieve the Spirit of God any longer! By the grace of God, we must obey our parents in all things from this very moment. As soon as we get home, as soon as we set foot within our doors, we must begin a new way of living! We must look upon our parents with new eyes. We must see them as representing our Father Who is in the heavens. We must learn and study, looking forward to pleasing them, to helping them, and to obeying them in all things. We must behave not simply as their child should behave, but as their servant for Christ’s sake, as the Scriptures have taught us. In this way we will truly learn to love one another in ways we did not know before! God will respond by making them a blessing to you and you a blessing to them. And all who witness your relationship will see that God is with you. Many will see your love of each other and praise God, and the results of your love will remain even after you have passed away from this life and into the arms of God. [Amen.]


Some Clarifications – Friday, June 17, 2022

Friday, June 17, 2022

On January 17, 2021, I experienced the word of the Lord coming to me and asking me to resign from the vocation of pastoral ministry. At that time, I had been a credentialed pastor in the Church of the Nazarene for sixteen years. My last day as a credentialed minister was February 28, 2021.

Over the last year and a half, the Lord has been discipling me, and I have been coming to understand slowly why I had to leave the vocation of pastor and what the Lord intends next.

This message of clarification is for those who have been journeying on a similar road. Some of you I know; some I don’t. But we all share in common a sense that the season of God’s mercy is at its end, and a season of judgment is falling upon both the Church and the nations of the earth.

At the time of my resignation, I declared a call to repentance for the Church, which I still believe I did in obedience to Jesus. That call can be found in a message entitled “Words.”


I would encourage any who share my concern to listen again to that message, asking God in prayer to confirm or to deny its call to repentance.

As I have continued on this journey out of ministry and into discipleship to Jesus, I gave another message in August of 2021, entitled “Signing Off.” In that message, I tried to explain the work that the Lord has been doing in showing me that the call to ministry I had followed and the ambition that I was still cultivating to accomplish something meaningful and lasting for God were idols, infested with false spirits, calling me (and others like me) to service and to significance, but not to the way of Jesus.


Again, I would encourage any who share my concern to listen or to re-listen to that message again.

And yet, though at that time I stepped back both from preaching and from my attempts to build a ministry platform on social media, the Lord seemed to give me intermittent assignments, which required me to remain engaged in ways I thought were to be left behind me. I released several videos, and then I felt the Lord asking me to produce a series of messages revealing to His people the true nature of His judgment on the world. The result was a podcast series entitled, “The gods of the West.”

Links to that podcast series can be found at the following link: https://shadowofthecross.org/the-gods-of-the-west-series/).

Then, near the end of 2021 I was asked to serve as an interim minister of the church I was attending, and I knew that this assignment was also of the Lord. So, I accepted, and since February of 2022, I have been preaching again every week. The Lord asked me to lead that congregation through the book of the prophet Amos, which included more explanations for why God brings judgment along with more appeals to His people to repent. So, despite having signed-off in August, the Lord has not yet released me to step away fully.

I have come to understand this delay in my departure as the mercy of God. Still God’s people have not repented, and still He is making His appeal, both through me and through others similarly commissioned. I expect that my commitment to signing off was personally necessary in August of 2021, but the actual finality of it is still yet in the future. I am preparing for it, and when God wills it, I will obey. But, God seems to have delayed my departure from public ministry temporarily.

In recent days, the intensity of God’s appeals have been increasing. On April 22, 2022, the word of the Lord came to me and instructed me to warn His people that the Church was, in fact, the harlot of Revelation. This I did in a message entitled “The Harlot of Revelation.”


Then on May 27, 2022, the word of the Lord came to me, assigning me to contrast the teachings of the Ten Commandments and Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount with the institutional, ritual, and ethical practices of the Christian Churches. This I did in a message entitled, “The Calling Out of the Church.”


And then, on May 31, 2022, I experienced the word of the Lord coming to me again, assigning me to communicate His will to His followers that it is now time to leave the institutional churches. I obeyed in a message entitled “It’s Time to Go.”


Again, I’d encourage all who share my concern to listen afresh to these messages.

This progression all makes sense to me, but perhaps it has left some of you who are journeying with me confused or perplexed. I received questions from some of my Christian friends asking me if this meant that I would be leaving my current ministry assignment. Others have indicated that there is nothing wrong with the institutional church that cannot be corrected. And others have assumed that I have been taken by some sort of an anti-institutional spirit that is inconsistent with the Scriptures.

I’ll do my best to explain what I understand. God’s judgment is not coming on the Christian Church because it is an institution. God’s judgment is coming on the Christian Church because it has institutionally aligned itself with the spirits in rebellion against God.

Jesus’ kingdom is not of this earth (John 18:36), nor is it to be built the way earthly kingdoms are built (Luke 22:25-27). Jesus required no buildings, instead, the Apostles spoke of the gathered community of faith as the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 3:16). Jesus required only small gatherings—instructing His people that they required only two or three gathered for Him to be with them (Matthew 18:15-20). The earliest followers of Jesus incorporated study of the Prophets and Apostles, Prayers, and Table Fellowship as the only components of their gatherings (Acts 2:43-47).

Today Christians are enthralled with Nephilim—that is, with people of great talent and great accomplishment. We pursue excellence, seeking the most gifted and talented to worship for us and to enrapture us with their supreme efforts to honor God. Through them, we have come to believe that we can connect with God and enter into His presence. As far as I can tell, this is pagan. It was to avoid this that the early church prohibited musical performances as part of Christian worship for nearly the first two centuries of the faith. It was also to avoid this that Paul warned the first century churches to be wary of super apostles who entertained the masses with their eloquent rhetoric and charismatic presentations.

And, perhaps, most lamentable of all, is the Church’s caricature of the Gospel itself. Long forgotten is Jesus’ call to deny ourselves, take up our crosses, and follow Jesus. The Gospel, today, insists that Jesus denied Himself so that we do not have to deny ourselves, that Jesus took up His cross so that we do not have to take up crosses, that Jesus was obedient to God because we will never be obedient. In this Gospel, Jesus fulfilled all God’s hopes for humanity, so that those who believe in His work do not have to please God or do His will themselves. Long forgotten is the promise of God delivered to the Church through the Apostle Paul:

12 Therefore sin is not to reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts, 13 and do not go on presenting the parts of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those who are alive from the dead, and your body’s parts as instruments of righteousness for God. 14 For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under the Law but under grace.

Romans 6:12-14, NASB

If I am hearing God adequately (and time will most certainly reveal if I am), then God’s word to the Church today is two-fold:

15 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you travel around on sea and land to make one proselyte; and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.”.

Matthew 23:15, NASB

And…

“One thing you still lack; sell all that you possess and distribute the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”

Luke 18:22, NASB

So, it is time to leave. It is time to sell all we’ve accumulated, and give it back to the world from whence it came. It is time to leave behind our legacies and our bylaws and our buildings and our savings accounts. It’s time to leave Egypt and follow God into the wilderness with the Scriptures alone.

And I, too, must repent. In fact, this last year and a half has been the beginning of my repentance. Why? Because pastors like me are part of the reason the Church has become irredeemably corrupted by the world.

When God called me to feed His sheep, I wanted to do nothing else. I wanted that to be all I did with my life. I wanted that call to be a career to which I would devote my full-time. To do that I needed an institution to support me, tithers to support that institution, and on and on. I needed a kingdom on earth in order to have the future I was pursuing.

For me, and so many others like me, we can’t repent because too much depends on the survival of the institution as it is. From Christian schools, to Seminaries, to the contemporary Christian music industry, to Christian media outlets, to parachurch agencies, to Church hierarchies and administrative organizations and staff, to clergy, to local churches it is nearly impossible to calculate how many of us depend for our living on the survival of the Church as it is.

I am coming to understand that this is why I had to forsake my calling…because my calling was part of what is keeping the Church from returning to Jesus and to the simple worship of the first believers. So, I repent. I am sorry both to God and to believers for trying to make my living off of the Gospel. I have left. And though the Lord has asked me to serve temporarily in order to make one more appeal to His people to repent, I will soon leave for good.

But, this is not to leave Jesus, nor to leave the fellowship of believers. It is simply to leave an institution which has been designed to preserve itself and to raise up disciples who will preserve it indefinitely. The institutional church has become too big to fail, and so, its corruption is now no longer a bug, but a feature.

It is time to begin again…with just the Scriptures, prayer, and table fellowship with two or three gathered. And for those concerned there won’t be enough checks and balances to protect the church from heresy…look at where we are and ask yourself if all the institutional checks and balances have truly kept the Church from apostasy.

Perhaps it is time to believe that God is actively involved in preserving His own Truth. Perhaps it is only in our arrogance that we have assumed that God needs our institutional help to protect His investment in the world.

To those who have ears to hear, it’s time to go.

~ J. Thomas

John Wesley Sermons – On the Trinity (1 John 5:7)

Preached by John Wesley on May 7, 1775

Language updated and edited by J. Thomas Johnson – June 12, 2022

The original sermon can be found in The Works of John Wesley, Volume 6 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1996).



As I prepared to share Wesley’s reflections on the doctrine of the Trinity today, I was reminded of a recent experience at my last ministry assignment. When I was pastoring Christ Community Church of the Nazarene in Camillus, NY in the middle of a sermon in which I mentioned the Trinity a visitor to the congregation stood up, interrupted the message, and reprimanded me publicly. He was of the opinion that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were three distinct beings—that is, three Gods. Their oneness, according to him, was a way of speaking of their agreement with one another, but not of their being, together, one God.

In response, I led the congregation to the Nazarene hymnal, and I read aloud the Nicene Creed. For me, at that time, it was an open and shut case. Either one confesses belief in the Trinity or one is not Christian. The man was quite upset and ended up leaving the service before I had finished explaining the orthodox Christian view. It’s one of those moments that has stayed with me. So, as I prepared this week to learn from John Wesley, I was anxious to hear what he had to say about the Trinity.

I’ve had to do a little editing of Wesley’s teaching throughout the message just to keep his main point clear. Several of the illustrations Wesley used, though perfectly suitable in 1775, prove to be quite dated today. Having lived before Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity, for instance, Wesley’s understanding of gravity and the motion of the planets was limited to that of his time. With that said, I think the points Wesley was attempting to make remain important. So, I have updated his illustrations with some that speak similarly today as his did to his original audience.

Also, the main passage Wesley was discussing in this sermon is 1 John 5:7. Interestingly, that verse occurs in a greatly abbreviated form in modern translations of the Bible. And the verse was debated heavily in Wesley’s day, as well. Wesley seems to have believed that the longer version of 1 John 5:7 was authentic. Most scholars today believe the additional language was added later. In light of this, I have added a few verses to Wesley’s message that help to support his point beyond 1 John 5:7.

With that said, I will begin Wesley’s message by reading the same passage from the King James Version, which is the closest version to the one from which Wesley was preaching.

1 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth. For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

1 John 5:1-8, KJV

Whatever people may assume, opinion is not religion. Religion is not simply a way of speaking of a set of right opinions, nor is religion mentally agreeing with one or even with ten-thousand truths. Religion and opinion are worlds apart. Even a right opinion is as far from religion as the east is from the west. People can hold correct opinions about a great many things, and still, at the same time, be irreligious. And, on the other hand, people may be truly religious while, at the same time, holding many wrong opinions.

Can anyone possibly doubt this while Roman Catholicism remains in the world? For who can deny not only that throughout history many of this tradition have been truly religious—such as, Thomas à Kempis, Gregory Lopez, and the Marquis [Jean Baptiste] de Renty—, but also that many even today are real inward Christians? And yet, what a heap of erroneous opinions do they hold, delivered by tradition from their fathers! Even more, who can doubt this while there are Calvinists in the world—that is, those who believe in absolute predestination? Will anyone dare argue that none of these people are truly religious? Not only were many of them in the last century burning and shining lights, but many of them are still today real Christians, loving God and all humankind. And yet what are all the absurd opinions of the Roman Catholic Church compared to that one of the Calvinists that the God of love—the wise, just, merciful Father of the spirits of all flesh—has, from all eternity, fixed an absolute, unchangeable, irresistible decree that part of humankind will be saved and they have no say whatsoever in their salvation and that part of humankind will be condemned eternally and they have no say whatsoever in their damnation!

In light of this, we cannot but conclude that there are ten thousand mistakes which may coexist with real religion. Therefore, any careful and considerate person will allow for differing opinions. But there are some truths that are more important than others. It seems there are some which are of deep importance. I do not call them, myself, fundamental truths because that is an ambiguous word, and, consequently, there have been many heated disputes about the number of fundamentals. With that said, there are some truths which we must be concerned with knowing because of their close connection with vital religion. [In other words, there are some truths that are so central to the ways in which we worship God that to change them would be to change how the Scriptures require us to worship.]  And certainly we might rank the words of 1 John 5:7 among these:

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1 John 5:7, KJV

Now, I do not mean to say that we must believe this tradition or that tradition’s explanation of these words. In my opinion, a wise person would not attempt to explain them at all. One of the best tracts which that great man, Dean [Jonathan] Swift, ever wrote was his Sermon upon the Trinity. In that sermon, Swift has demonstrated that all who have tried to explain the Trinity at all have utterly lost their way and done more theological harm than good.

[In the words of Jonathan Swift himself, from his sermon first printed in 1744:

Since the world abounds with troublesome books, particularly written against the doctrine of the Trinity, it is important to inform you that the authors of these books were mistaken from the beginning. Their desire was to demonstrate how impossible it is that three can be one and one can be three. However, the Scripture says no such thing, at least not in the way they have taken it. The Scriptures only say that there is some kind of unity and distinction in the divine nature, which humankind cannot possibly comprehend. Therefore, the whole doctrine is short and plain and should not be controversial. God has simply revealed the fact but concealed the manner. And therefore, many theologians who thought it best to refute those wicked books have been mistaken, too, by answering fools according to their folly and trying to explain a mystery, which God intended to keep secret from us. Therefore, I would encourage all people to avoid reading those wicked books written against the doctrine of the Trinity, and I would also encourage them to omit the responses to those books as unnecessary, as well.]

Swift, A Sermon on the Doctrine of the Trinity, 1744, 11

Such folks have only, as Job has said, “darkened the divine plan by words without knowledge?” (Job 38:2, NASB). It was in an evil hour that these expositors began their fruitless work.

I insist upon no explanation of the Trinity at all, not even the best one I ever saw—that is, that which is given to us in the creed commonly ascribed to Athanasius. [The Athanasian Creed begins with the words:

Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith; Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.

And the catholic faith is this: That we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance.

Historic Creeds and Confessions, electronic ed. (Oak Harbor: Lexham Press, 1997)

And so it continues.]

I would not say that those who cannot agree with the Athanasian Creed “will without doubt perish everlastingly.” Because of this statement and another later in the creed, I, for some time, did require that all believers subscribe to that creed. But then I realized, first, that these sentences relate only to willful unbelievers—that is, to those who have had opportunity to read and understand this creed, but who still reject it.  And second, that they relate only to the substance of the doctrine of the Trinity, not to the philosophical illustrations of it.

I do not insist that anyone use the word Trinity or Person when speaking of God. I use these terms myself without any difficulty, because I know of no better words. But if anyone has a problem with them, who should force him or her to use them? Not I. I would not burn a man alive for saying, “Though I believe the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God; yet I struggle with using the words Trinity and Persons because I do not find those terms in the Bible.” These are the words which the merciful John Calvin cited as having been written by Servetus. [Servetus was burned at the stake for heresy under Calvin’s leadership in the town of Geneva.] I would insist only on the words just as they appear in the Scriptural text without explanation:

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1 John 5:7, KJV

“Just as they appear in the Scriptural text.” But here arises a question: Is that text genuine? Were the words “…the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one…” originally written by the Apostle John, or were they inserted later by others? Many have questioned the authenticity of this passage, . . . .

[Whatever the outcome of the debate over the authenticity of 1 John 5:7, several other passages describe God as both Three and One. The insistence on the Oneness of God is from the beginning, as can be seen in Deuteronomy 6:4: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.” And yet, Jesus revealed distinctions within the Oneness. For instance, in John 10:27-30, Jesus said:

27 My sheep listen to My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28 and I give them eternal life, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. 30 I and the Father are one.

John 10:27-30, NASB

Furthermore, in Matthew 28:18-20, Jesus taught His disciples:

18 And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me. 19 Go, therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to follow all that I commanded you; and behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

Matthew 28:18-20, NASB

And the following exchange between the Apostle Philip and Jesus in John 14:8-11 is particularly telling:

Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” 9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you for so long a time, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? The one who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10 Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in Me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own, but the Father, as He remains in Me, does His works. 11 Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me; otherwise believe because of the works themselves.”

John 14:8-11, NASB

We could go on, but that should suffice for our present purposes.]

Another objection has been made: “Whatever one makes of the text of 1 John 5:7, we cannot believe what we cannot understand. Therefore, when you require us to believe mysteries, we ask to be excused.”

Here is a two-fold mistake: First, you are not required to believe any mystery with respect to the Trinity, despite your belief to the contrary. And second, every person already believes many things that s/he cannot understand.

To begin with the latter: Each of us already believes many things which we cannot fully comprehend. Each of us believes that there is a sun over our heads. . . . [and we believe that the earth revolves around the sun, along with the other planets, by a force called gravity. But, what precisely is gravity. When NASA was asked that question in its Starchild Question of the Month in February of 2001, the NASA response was:

We don’t really know. We can define what it is as a field of influence, because we know how it operates in the universe. And some scientists think that it is made up of particles called gravitons which travel at the speed of light. However, if we are to be honest, we do not know what gravity “is” in any fundamental way – we only know how it behaves

https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question30.html

.

But even though we cannot fully comprehend what gravity is, we still believe that the motion of the planets around the sun is effected by it.]

We believe there is such a thing as light, whether it emanates from the sun or any other light source, but we cannot fully comprehend either its nature or the manner in which it flows. . . . [Michael Schirbner, in his 2007 Live Science article entitled, “The Enduring Mystery of Light,” has written:

It goes through walls, but slows to a standstill in ultra-cold gases. It carries electronic information for radios and TVs, but destroys genetic information in cells. It bends around buildings and squeezes through pinholes, but ricochets off tiny electrons.

It’s light. And although we know it primarily as the opposite of darkness, most of light is not visible to our eyes. From low energy radio waves to high energy gamma rays, light zips around us, bounces off us, and sometimes goes through us.

Because it is so many things, defining light is a bit of a philosophical quandary. It doesn’t help that light continue to surprise us, with novel materials that alter light’s speed and trajectory in unexpected ways.]

https://www.livescience.com/7186-enduring-mystery-light.html

Explain this, and I will explain the Three-One God.

. . . .

Many people believe we have souls. . . . [that] we have an immaterial soul connected with this physical body. But can any of us fully comprehend how? What are the ties that unite the heavenly flame with the earthly clod? None of us understands this. Those who believe this assume it to be true, but how it is, no one can explain.

. . . .

In summary, those who will not believe anything that they cannot fully comprehend, must not believe [in gravity], that there is light shining around them, nor that they have a soul. . . .

Secondly, as strange as it may seem, in requiring us to believe:

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one;

1 John 5:7, KJV

we are not required to believe any mystery.  That great and good man, Dr. Peter Browne, the former bishop of Cork, has demonstrated that the Bible does not require us to believe any mystery at all. The Bible only requires us to believe facts, not the manner by which they have come to be facts. The mystery, after all, does not lie in the fact, but entirely in the manner.

For instance, “God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light” (Genesis 1:3, NASB). I believe this. I believe the plain fact of it. There is no mystery at all in this. The mystery lies in the manner of it. How did it happen? How does creation work? I don’t know anything about the manner of it. I believe nothing about it. This is more an object of my faith than it is of my understanding.

To apply this to the Scripture passage before us:

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

1 John 5:7, KJV

I believe this fact also—namely, that God is Three and One. But I do not understand how this is so, and, therefore, I do not believe in the manner of it—the how of it. It is in the manner of it that the mystery lies. But I am not concerned with how this is so. That is not the object of my faith. I believe only what God has revealed and no more. God has not revealed how this is so, therefore, I believe nothing about the manner of it. But still, it would be absurd of me to deny the fact that God is Three and One simply because I do not understand the manner of it.  In other words, it would be absurd to reject what God has revealed simply because I do not fully comprehend what God has not revealed.

This is a significant point for us to grasp. There are many “Things which eye has not seen and ear has not heard, and which have not entered the human heart” (1 Corinthians 2:9, NASB). Some of these “to us God revealed them through the Spirit” (1 Corinthians 2:10, NASB)—“revealed;” that is, unveiled or uncovered. God revealed those parts He requires us to believe. But, parts of them God has not revealed. These things we need not and cannot believe. These unrevealed things are far above us, out of our sight.

Now, where is the wisdom of rejecting what is revealed because we do not understand what is not revealed? Is it wise to deny the fact of what God has unveiled because we cannot comprehend the manner of it, which remains hidden, especially when we consider that what God has revealed to us with respect to His being Three and One is a truth of the highest importance. This confession lies at the heart of Christianity, and, it lies at the root of all vital religion[—that is, at the heart of how the Scriptures instruct us to worship God.]

Unless these Three are One, how can “all honor the Son just as they honor the Father” (John 5:23, NASB). Socinus wrote in a letter to his friend, “I know not what to do with my untoward followers. They will not worship Jesus Christ. I tell them that it is written, ‘And let all the angels of God worship Him’ (Hebrews 1:6, NASB). They answer, “However that be, if he is not God, we dare not worship him. For ‘It is written: you shall worship the lord your God and serve him only’ (Luke 4:8, NASB).

What I’m trying to explain is this: The knowledge of the Three-One God is interwoven into all true Christian faith, and, therefore, with all vital religion[—that is, with all Christian worship.]

I am not arguing that every real Christian must confess with the Marquis de Renty, “I bear with me continually an experience of the truth of and an abundance of the presence of the ever-blessed Trinity.” I presume that this is not the experience of “children,” but rather “fathers in Christ.”

But I do not know how anyone can be a Christian believer until he has, as the Apostle John has written, “the testimony in himself;” until “The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God” (Romans 8:16, NASB)—that is, until the Holy Spirit testifies that God the Father has accepted him through the merits of God the Son, and, having this testimony, he honors the Son and the blessed Spirit, even as he honors the Father.

It is not that every Christian testifies to this. Early in the Christian walk, perhaps one in twenty would not confess it. But, if you were to ask any true believer a few questions, you would find quite quickly that it is implied in what he or she believes.

Therefore, I do not see how it is possible for any to have vital religion and deny that these Three are One. My hope for them is not that they will be saved, but that, before they pass into eternity, God will bring them “the knowledge of the truth” (Hebrews 10:26, NASB). [Amen.]